Instagram repeat it: no sell photos users

Following the turmoil after the release of the new terms and conditions of Instagram, the company claims that things were misunderstood
A day after the release of the new terms and conditions In Instagram and anger arising from the fact that they allow the company to use the pictures for commercial customers and sell them on - back in Ainstgrm these intentions and that in fact it was never the plan, and there is little understanding of the wording.
In a post published Founder Kevin Sistrum, titled "Thank you, and we listen," says cal misinterpret legal documents "and explained what the true intent of new formulations. By Sistrum, the company intends to try a model of integrating advertisements In Instagram that would not offend experience - and that dealing with the wording incorrectly understood as an intention to sell on the images of users. "That's not true, and it is our mistake we used confusing language. To be clear: we do not intend to sell your photos," the letter said.
"The language we used raised the question of whether your images can be a part of advertising. We have no plans for such a thing, so we remove the wording raised questions," he added Sistrum. "Instagram users are owners of their content and Instagram not claim ownership of the images. Anything that has not changed. We respect the artists and amateurs alike and respect the fact that these Tmonotichm", period. "
Privacy promises Sistrim nothing has changed, and who defines the private accounts will continue to expose the pictures only to those members confirmed. "I always want you to feel comfortable sharing images In Instagram , and always work hard to nurture and respect the community, and we try to support their rights," he promises.

The choice was: Take it or leave the service

Instagram blog post came in the wake of the storm created after the release of new terms and conditions, public criticism, scathing articles in the press and financial sanctions style known National Geographic, announced they would stop upload photos of their  account. "We are very concerned with the direction of the new terms and conditions offered, and if they remain as shown - may we close our account," National Geographic announced. Application's Starmatic, Streamzoo competing In Instagram, won a number of images increases twice usual last night, after the publication of the disputed terms and conditions.
"Instagram gave people a choice rather blunt: Take it or leave the service," said Attorney Kurt Aofshl, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which deals with issues of freedom of a network. Bakerloo Rustd, Suffolk University law Prof. Netanyahu, said the new usage conditions make it difficult for users Instagram claim it and remove it from the legal responsibility, as only a few social services are doing.
"Despite the backlash against technology services is that, shocking to see the change in feeling towards Instagram within 24 hours. Last time I remember such a change was when Netflix has made a series of mistakes that caused many users to leave and reduced the value of the stock by two-thirds," wrote Christina Warren on -Mashable. "This is excellent Shainstgrm hear the feedback of its users, but if she does not take quick action - perhaps it will be too late."