Apple: Did Steve Jobs stole the show iPad?

After Steve Jobs introduced the iPad 2 Despite his illness leave, the question is: what interest you more iPad or Jobs?
We got two big news of Apple's event yesterday. The first is> Members 2 - new Tablet PC company. The second is Steve Jobs - CEO of non - new at all. On previous occasions that came Jobs on sick leave, he avoided directing Apple's events, and even was in the audience. But it seems that rumors of his impending death, based on photographs published in tabloid American National Enquirer, led him into action in order to deliver a clear message: I'm still alive. So what was more impressive than yesterday -> Members 2 or Jobs 1?

Jobs, Only Jobs  
With all due respect iPad, the real news yesterday was Steve Jobs healthy enough to guide the Apple event. This is, after all, not just a CEO of a company, but the man responsible for substantial vision of Apple's success. Evidence - the decade in which Jobs was at Apple, the company almost failed. Two years after he arrived, the company introduced the iMac. What's more, the iPad two really is not very exciting. True, he is thin and easier, its more powerful processor, but no USB and has a better screen. Experience of its use is expected to be very similar, almost identical to that of the first iPad. Otherwise, Front camera and camera back are extra amazing. This is precisely the reason why the appearance of Steve Jobs was the nail in the evening. Ultimately, Jobs is the one who will be responsible for the next great innovation from Apple. Without it, chances are this innovation will be less interesting. 

iPad
With all due respect to Steve Jobs, a CEO not only responsible for Apple's success. The man indeed contributed greatly to creating the company's product line, but Apple now can be run well even without Jobs. And yesterday she again showed why: The new iPad min It's easier, more powerful processor, a better operating system and two cameras that enable the photograph and make video calls. True, it's not a revolutionary device, but Apple does not believe in revolutions annually. Instead, prefer the company to introduce a product in her eyes was considered revolutionary, and then start polishing it. This polish, which can occur even without Jobs, the leading handset every year it becomes a little better. Only if you look at the evolution of several generations, you will see really significant differences. So yes, maybe> Members 2 not revolutionary.