Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook that will save the

Facebook pressed against Google's entry into plus. Write Walla! Mobilized to provide ideas for improving the company's CEO and network change


End of June we are not cool for you. Google launched the Google is plus surprise ", and could quickly reach ten million users (one of which is you). Unlike previous social products of the company, this time there seems to be going to collapse soon. It seems that you are afraid, or a little hard to explain what I been - so to block applications that allow exporting friends on Facebook Google Plus and why you forbade the Facebook ads (paid) intended to publish it. To help you keep the house, joined the writings of Walla! And led to suggestions what can be done, add and modify Facebook. This ensures that users of today will remain the users of tomorrow. We would appreciate your care. 

Stopped scales chat 

 Hello, Mark Zakrberg. Yes, I know, we tend to write "Zuckerberg" because that's what people search for on Google, but you and me, we know this is not your last name. And there's one thing we know - you're there on Facebook, not very strong in this segment of innovations in recent years. True, you can rationalize it by any change leads wave of criticism, but there is a wave and a tsunami. And your new chat system? Well, her responses are a tsunami of tears and anger. So right from the start Facebook chat was not a great idea - we do not really want to talk with our most Facebook friends, and those who do - are we on Google Talk and IM. But hey, already developed, so why not use. But now, with new design, the system simply is not usable. First of all, what closes with a list of new names? Why can not scroll? And why it shows me a mess of friends on On - Line and Off - Line alike, as if the second kind is relevant to the service and should take the place of use are available that are specifically looking for if not their names. I understand the new mechanism and amazing to find out what kind of people I most love to talk and put them up, but hey, it just does not work. I did not want to manually type the name of the member just to see if he is available to chat (and find out who). So you know what? Keep going with this nonsense, and we will continue to write "Zuckerberg." 

Facebook, go look 
 
Let's say the truth, the search is on Facebook crappy little. Apart from searching a person's name or page, there is no chance of finding something valuable on Facebook. And what can we look for social networking? Everything, just like Google. If we're going to a restaurant, why not look for Facebook what our friends told her, or friends of our friends? Someone ate the last two years there, and probably wrote something on Facebook.
A proper search would find us all the relevant statuses, and arrange them according to our social context whose writer. This is also true answer should be up for not only Google grading, but Google at all - instead of search results based on information, like Google, we get search results based on our members. 

Want to compete with Google? Improve it! 
 
Facebook reality of today, there are no words terrifying than suddenly floating-mail box: X tagged your picture on Facebook. Yes, just a few hours I let my guard, and you have already damaged the facade without permit. And do not even remember the party last got drunk and ended the evening with a reverse in an aquarium, while some 'friend' amused perpetuates you an iPhone. But here, it's already there, on your own wall. Photo ugly and unflattering and you could download only late in the day that you were not near a computer or mobile connection. Meanwhile, cumulative damage and spread in all spheres of your friends, and now everyone knows you're behind. Anything that requires approval. All PC's tiny operation requires Snklik Yes, okay, Continis, and Oatabr. Operating systems do have the death until they are convinced that we agree an action performed. Facebook also insists that we confirm the member, the post, the deletion of the post. But when a friend does to us (photo) murder a touch, the Taj - no one wants to acknowledge that before. Why? After all, if we're in the picture, and that our wall, why not force the guys ask us to confirm the labeling? Enough policy Tug price, Zuckerberg, fix this immediately. 

Say No 
 
All in all you wanted to respond to the status of a member. Maybe someone had written "Happy Birthday" and added under the "me too", instead of writing his own status. Maybe you treated briefly for something does not matter that he wrote. Or all in all you did "Lake" on a random status bar, and really not built on the knot between you and her from now on. But no, you can not disconnect. From now on - any reaction that would produce concatenate added to your Notifiktzih. Anyone else had written "Happy Birthday"? You must know that. Five of his friends wrote to him "You're right!! 1" on the status? It must be also interesting to you. How about not? Nothing to do. Until the hearing is not in the tens of comments, you will continue to receive every update and update, even if it is information that really is not worth the trouble of a click-through. So Dear Mark, Here's a suggestion. Like the side, the Comment and-Share Add another small one option: Unsubscribe. Clicking on it will override the message thread that updates the user who merely click Lake and wanted to get home (ie, Home Page) in peace. 

The right not to like 
 
If there's anything that really bothers me that Facebook is the philosophy behind it - you can not really hate something. The maximum possible is to cancel endearment (Dislike removes the Blake you did before). This despite the fact that most blog on Facebook, we do not like. Only a few of the most successful and we do Lake. The problem here is primarily conceptual, that if you want to say you do not like something on Facebook, you first have to declare that you are so fond of him, and that the greatest absurdity. Button "Disliik" Facebook could provide the best solution to this issue. Could then be put ostentatiously - but not too offensive - opposition, disagreement and even dislike of something. But who are we kidding, it does not really stand a chance. Zuckerberg would not dare put a small trace of a universe full of pet hate (and cash) he established. Or maybe it will, just Google statuses plus praise. 

We're all friends, we do not even like 'pretend' 
 
All Single / the average / Z know / the the situation: get one dating applications on Facebook and mark the potential partners (Editor's note: No, Rosenthal, not all Facebook like wolves). One thing leads to, correspondence from leading companies and, perhaps, even more than that. But this offer of friendship is a calculated risk: it's one of those valuable friendships becomes renders it invisible as soon as a failed date, and often even before (Gee, I did not see the main picture you have pimples, yams and wispy mustache drooping fancy). Unscrupulous among us will remove the profile immediately, the possible absorption of angry mail evidence of the "if only you'd give it a try." But you can avoid embarrassing situations like this. Should add a feature "Facebook dating" that will allow to define precisely the instant friendships that were created for this purpose. With his help, when you remove the member / her they will not feel or know. To them, you still friends with them. When they look at your profile will appear as members, but they do not appear in your list and they will have free access to images and other private areas in profile. At some point they will take the deception, but to let them know they are only members of the 'as if', you will not see them three feet. Besides, if not always pleasant to say that there can be a problem on Facebook. After all, you are presented to them as members, is not it?
Reticon wander

I'd just come to see "American Idol" and really you want to share them all you think about David Lavi? Housing protest and burn your soul you have everyone know what you think about the price of your apartment? How well have the Facebook. You run to your computer and pour your mind. Just 'enter' key and this little one. Everyone knows how you are involved in social / how much you hate Zvika Hadar. Only in the morning you find that you wrote that you hate the aggregate dropper, and that you support the protest pen. Why? That Facebook did not bother to put a small feature that allows you to correct misspellings posts after you raise. Yes, that exists throughout the wretched word processing software, since "Einstein" and "kiotkst ", is not the biggest social network. Did you typo? Deal. Or delete the post immediately (even if he has already receive comments and Likes), or everyone will see you all Dislktiotc. Mr. Zuckerberg, Ltifollach!
Facebook Tell me, what should you read?
Anyone who is involved and over the age of 25 know the thing: When he visits on Facebook, he will purchase ads engagement rings. Facebook knows us quite a bit, and if she channeled her extensive knowledge of this publication, why not use it to give us recommendations in other areas? Facebook knows what movies I like? Know. She knows what movies my friends recommend? Of course. She also knows which of them good friends of mine who is a little less. Take these three components, mixing algorithm sophisticated enough, and give us a list of books / movies / songs our friends recommend us to read. If it works with engagement rings, there's no reason it would not work here too. 

Return the sex appeal - 
 
If there is one good reason to leave Facebook, it's probably because all the sex appeal - ran like a bathtub pulled the plug. Let it be clear, yes? Facebook has no desire to make Explore the possibilities - Bok, but cheery atmosphere of the kindergarten on the one hand, and bulletin board on the other demonstrations, became the Hfiisos dryer juices. Not to mention eggs. Zuckerberg may have made his fortune from being a geek misanthrope who recognize sex appeal - even if the latter will make him a lap dance, but now it's just time to wake up and realize - "Puck" is something you do dead jellyfish on the beach, not Virgins of sensitivity. And to "awake" - wink - wink in messages is not sexy or graceful. In fact these two elements you want to join a Carmelite convent. Ramsden, if there is anything that can prevent your chicken bleed magic golden eggs Google's lap Plus, it would disable the tension Boys - Girls Boys - Boys & Girls - Girls Do Hhnonramh sterile created. Make up application, find a button tickle did right, or complete enough for smart and passionate people to think for you. Only the name of God - whatever, let us hide it from our parents. More Lake of father to this topic with the potential replacement of fluids and we commit suicide.