Verizon and Google is not neutral

Two giant companies policies formulated a proposal regarding network neutrality, which they offer the American regulator. There are those who oppose 


Companies Google and Verizon have reached an agreement between them on Internet regulation as they see it. Rumors circulated last week about a deal that will provide Verizon Internet provider speed improved access Google services - for a fee. The problem with such a transaction is its contrast network neutrality concept, whereby the Internet provider to provide equal service to all network traffic. Both companies now offer a policy that includes seven sections, essentially the opposite last week rumors. According to the proposal, customers will receive equal access to all online content and public access will be given the regulatory authority of the U.S. Federal Communications (FCC) to the subject. The proposed policy would prohibit discrimination against content network content providers accept payment in exchange for their services increased speed. Policy violators fined amounts of up to two million dollars if the proposal is accepted. Verizon defined Google as "soft launched a new and Berthe - anti-discrimination enforcement, and asked the U.S. Congress to ban cable and telephony companies to slow down, block or accelerate web traffic for free on broadband lines they operate. That left companies with a place to charge more for premium services such as medical monitoring and separate services from the Internet open. Verizon also want Google to be given exemption from mobile network neutrality - which will serve both the Google, is developing a mobile operating system Android, Verizon and the - that provides cellular services. These proposals are dragged behind criticism and allegations, including the claim that implementation of the proposal production "information superhighway collection positions." "This framework with huge holes in it, Mplahat the Internet for a number of companies with deep pockets," said Gu political adviser, to the vacancy. Andrew Jay Schwartzman, director of policy and non-profit organizations, stated that the proposal does not protect the needs of American Internet users. FCC has not yet responded to the proposal.