The tablet Surface Pro launched in the United States received by critics strange bird tries - and sometimes succeeds - to be two things at once
Released in October when the Surface RT - Microsoft's computer is also a tablet and Laftof - it was clear that the company has a trump card in hand on the hardware. Despite the weak performance claims something, and the lack of its ability to run Windows applications earlier, that started with Windows 8 version of the RT.
But the younger the surface of lettuce in the shadow of older brother, the Surface Pro, which was supposed to offer the perfect experience for Windows 8. Fundamental differences between the RT Surface pro version: pro version a bit more heavy, less slender but more powerful (thanks to Intel Core i5 processor, four gigabytes of memory, and storage of 64 or 128 GB). Pro designed for release in January 2013, and now is here (well, not really here - but in the U.S.) - and with it the reviews it.
Difficult to read:
David Pierce at TheVerge, states that compared to what is out there - it's more of a laptop, and even harder to read Lsrfs tablet - because of his weight. But Pierce's main complaint is that you can not work with the device when he placed you on the thighs, because the class of Hsrafiis, the Kickstand, which opened only one angle. On the other hand, if you have computers that can move quickly from table table - you can consider the Surface pro.
Pierce still complains about the relatively short battery life - four hours of theVerge battery test (continuous run of videos, 65% screen brightness).
And if we dealt with on the screen - Pierce's screen is very enthusiastic about the new surface, and argues that this is one of the best screens he saw portable - Full HD resolution of 1920 by 1080 pixels, screen size of 10.6 inches, very sharp, he said, with a very natural color reproduction.
"The PC Back"
"The Microsoft Surface proves that the PC back," says John Biggs at TechCrunch. According to Biggs, grow very enthusiastic about what-Pro, This computer was finally closed enough to convince people consider Windows 8, meanwhile some wading markets.
Biggs praising the hardware - the strong magnets that take the keyboard and charging cable and stylus pen from a vacuum attachment to provide tablet PC provider, although his colleague from TheVerge claims he has a tendency to break away.
In terms of experience, Biggs states that it is on a PC, and that success can be used as a tablet fine art needs. This is not the best tablet out there, he says, but a combination of tablet and PC classic work - is better, and the difference compared with other hybrid computers.
Or tablet PC? Both!
The title of David Fogg is the New York Times - "This tablet. No, this PC. The Surface Pro is both." Fuji meets its readers complaining about the issue price of the Surface Pro - not an easy matter at all, when the price of the 64 GB version is $ 900, while the -128 GB version costs $ 1,000, saying at that price you can buy a powerful laptop thin with more storage and large keyboard - so why buy a Surface? And Fogg also replies that the Surface can do things such mobile devices can not do. Is easier to them (several pounds alone), it can stay in its holster checks at the airport (a serious matter for the Americans), and one quickly substitutes does not replace the role fully mobile tablet. Yes, says Fogg, at that price you can buy a very nice laptop. You can also buy at this price a five-day cruise, a Gucci handbag, or 250 gallons of milk - but they are different things, he concludes by saying witty the uniqueness of the Surface.
Fuji also regrets the poor battery life (he managed to get away just 3.5 hours after charging), and agree that the surface is not suitable for everyone. But he praised the engineering achievement, and "trau How is pleased to food tray folding seat of an airplane. " "Lean back as much as you want," the experience of Fuji mocking the leanback - "I can tick him a job!"
"I can tick him work"
"Warmer, thicker, faster, louder"
Rival - Fuji's colleague, Walt Mossberg The Wall Street Journal and the creation AllThingsD blog insists compare the Surface tablet like the iPad. He complains about the relatively high proportion of the Surface versus other tablets and low battery life. It should be noted Mossberg puts his instruments murderous battery tests, almost not fair: Running Video at 75% screen brightness, with all the wireless devices operate. He also complains about the space the OS takes up the 64 GB version, which leaves very little space for storage, and actually agree with this argument and noted that his colleagues also.
In ArsTechnica review of pro title is "warmer, thicker, faster, louder," almost like a password Olympic Games - just not. ArsTechnica were exposed the problems with the new processors Intel 7W, actually consume 13 watts and seven (Average use only) - those processors are at the heart of the Surface Pro.
Their review is very technical in nature, and especially recommended hardware slickers among you. Regarding front and rear cameras, here too, like other critics, agree whose quality mediocre, at best. Skype calls are sufficient, but not as photography.
Summary
To summarize the reviews in the world, the motifs which are that the Surface is an odd one, that fits a very specific segment of the population: one tablet and also wants powerful computer to work, pack light and durable, willing to compromise a bit on battery life - and often work near a table. If you are looking or a tablet or a laptop - check other options. If you are looking for something that is both, the Surface Pro.
0 comments:
Post a Comment